So here’s
an edited-together email exchange I had with a friend:
--------------------------
Him:
From
the tape:
Mr.
Romney said that “my job is not to worry about those people. I’ll never
convince them they should take personal responsibility and care for their
lives.”
Then...
he added a moment later: “I say that jokingly, but it would be helpful to be,
uh, Latino.”
This is
over, dude. Over.
--------------------------
Me:
I hope
so. But I worry that half the nation is nodding their heads and going
"yup, guy has a point..."
Remember
how the GOP thought they had it locked up in 08 w/ "cling to god and their
guns."
Plus,
look at Missouri and see how little Todd "Mr. Rapey" Aikin's numbers have
fallen. People will still vote for this douche because he’s NOT Claire
McCaskill. Reminds me of that Pennsylvania Rep in 2006 who nearly got elected after
he admitted to cheating on his
wife AND trying to strangle his friggin’ mistress. Dude STILL got 47% of the
vote. So nearly half the people in his district were either totally OK with cheating
and attempted murder, or hate people the Dems THAT much. [NOTE: The Choking Man was Fightin' Mike Sherwood -- I looked it up.]
--------------------------
Him:
Yeah, I
hear that. But seems that at this point, in a tight national election, this
comment could kill him with the 5 percent of "independent" voters,
whoever the hell they really are.
We will
see. Obama's people in Chicago are rubbing their eyes this morning, surprised
to see it's already Christmas.
Perhaps
most telling: FoxNews.com still hasn't displayed the story ...
--------------------------
Him:
Well, here you go:
Looks
like they're going to play it straight – “I totally meant to say that”.
I think
this is a smart approach -- the people this comment is likely to piss off
are Obama supporters who were lost to him anyway. I really do think the other
half of the country is going to nod their head and say "yup, he's got a
point." The only people this might affect are the few last, true
undecideds who, let's face it, are basically bllithering idiots who are
watching "Honey Boo Boo" instead of the news, and will likely vote
Romney anyway because, well, they're blithering idiots.
Because
here's the thing -- and I hate to say this -- but he kind of does have a point. The 47%
thing also has a grain of truth. I don't get as mad about the phrase
'entitlement society' as, say, Uncle Steve, but I recognize it exists, and that
the Dems have basically kept themselves in office by pandering to this segment
of the nation. I sort of view it as a dark bargain, in the same way the
pro-business GOPers view their association with the evangelicals. By keeping
this segment of society afloat, the Dems assure themselves of a solid base of
unquestioning voters who will keep putting them in office so they can pursue
their agenda. Again, it's a purely cynical calculation. Like gay marriage. I don't
think anyone in Washington really gave a second thought to gay marriage until
Karl Rove pulled it out of his ass in 2004 and turned it into an issue because,
he rightly figured, it would rile up a lot of likely GOP voters. The Dems were
basically forced to adopt the opposite position (which they also didn't care
about) because, frankly, at that point where were the gays going to go?
This is
the same kind of thing.
All
these ignorant Teabillies, may of whom are on welfare or some other support
program, aren't going to get offended by this because they don't self-identify
as being on government support. They delusionally cling to the notion that
they're one chinchilla farm away from having a rotating car elevator in the
carport on their trailer.
I think
this whole thing feels like tempest in a teapot, less like people are really
outraged than Huffpost WANTS them to be outraged.
Of
course, I could be wrong.
--------------------------
Him:
I hear
you. And also you need to post this to a blog of some kind -- Among the
Teabillies, or something you could call it. [So, here you go. -D.]
I am
telling you -- I will bet $5 that this does register in the polls. The guy just
dismissed half the country as being Welfare Queens. I think the entitlement
society issue just CAN'T apply to that many people ...
We will
see
--------------------------
Me:
I will
actually take that bet -- if only in the hopes that I lose.
If it turns up, we should see it on 538, (which, if you aren't following you should be) in a couple of days.
--------------------------
Him:
Done.
And to me, that's a lot of money.
--------------------------
Me:
William
Saletan writes a deeply thoughtful, highly nuanced piece comparing Obama's
'God 'n' Guns' gaffe to Romney's '47%' gaffe -- and he totally supports your
position about which is worse (hint, rhymes w/ Bomny's).
I,
however, will bitterly cling to my position that this will go unnoticed because
most of the people in this country are not deeply thoughtful and highly
nuanced.
Case in
point -- 15% of Republicans in Ohio think Ronmey killed Osama.
--------------------------
Him:
Hahaha. I just fucking love that.
No comments:
Post a Comment